site stats

State of nagaland v. lipok

WebJan 24, 2014 · Lakhmir Singh (dead) and others (1984) 4 SCC 66, State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO and others 2005 (3 ) SCR 108 = 2005 (3 ) SCC 752, the Court, after referring to New India Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Shanti Misra 1976 (2) SCR 266 = 1975 (2) SCC 840, N. State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani1996 (1) SCR 1060 = 1996 (3) SCC 132 and Special Tehsildar, … WebAug 12, 2008 · State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO and Ors. [JT 2005 (4) SC 10] (Para 15) 2. Special Tehsildar, Land Acquisition, Kerala v. K.V. Ayisumma [JT 1996 (7) SC 204] (Para 15) 3. N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy [JT 1998 (6) SC 242] (Para 7) 4. State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani and Ors. [JT 1996 (3) SC 371] (Para 15) 5. G.

Brijesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors Court …

WebCourt In State Of Nagaland vs Lipok A.O. Reported In (2005) 2 Scc ... on 2 February, 2011. Author: Amit Talukdar. F.M.A.T. 1065 OF 20102.2.11 RE: CAN 6854 OF 2010Mr. Amit … redmon pro clean https://euromondosrl.com

Esha Bhattacharjee V/s. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur …

WebIn State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO and others8, the Court, after referring to New India Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Shanti Misra9, N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy10, State of … WebFurthermore, in the case of Nagaland v. Lipok (2005) 3 SCC 752, the Supreme Court held that certain amount of latitude is permissible having regard to the considerable delay of procedural red tape in the decision making process of the government, making the distinction between an individual seeking condonation of delay versus a State agency/body. WebJun 28, 2024 · State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO (2005) 3 SCC 752 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Criminal Appeal No. 484 of 2005 (arising out of … redmon sealcoating

State of Nagaland Vs. Lipok Ao & Ors [2005] INSC 213 (1 April 2005)

Category:Scope and Significance of Examination of Accused under

Tags:State of nagaland v. lipok

State of nagaland v. lipok

State Of Nagaland V. Lipok AO 2005, Limitation Act ( Law

WebMar 24, 2014 · The High Court had given cogent and valid reasons and relied upon large number of judgments of this Court while rejecting the application for condonation of delay including Mewa Ram (Deceased by L.Rs) & Ors. v. State of Haryana, AIR 1987 SC 45; State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 2191; and D. Gopinathan Pillai v. WebThe State of Nagaland questions correctness of the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Gauhati High Court, Kohima Bench refusing to condone the delay by …

State of nagaland v. lipok

Did you know?

WebSep 11, 2024 · State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao September 11, 2024 Case name : State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao Citations: State of Nagaland v. Lipok… You may have missed 6 min … WebApr 14, 2024 · (State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao; 2007 Cr.L.J. 3395 (DB) (Ajai Singh v. State of Maharashtra; AIR 2007 SC 2188) It is also important to note that the accused is provided with the opportunity to not avail the chance of providing explanation against the evidence incriminating him in the court.(Subhash Chandra V. State of Rajasthan; AIR 2007 SC 2188)

WebMar 26, 2016 · Nagaland v. Lipok AO & Ors., AIR 2005 SC 2191; and D. Gopinathan Pillai v. State of Kerala & Anr., AIR 2007 SC 2624. 7. The issues of limitation, delay and laches as well as condonation of such delay are being examined and explained every day by the Courts. The law of limitation is enshrined in the legal maxim “Interest WebAug 3, 2024 · 8.3.2024 Devasthan Order - Read online for free.

http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/state-of-nagaland-vs-lipok-ao-and-ors WebApr 22, 2013 · In State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO (supra), the Court referred to several precedents on the subject and observed that the proof of sufficient cause is a condition precedent for exercise of discretion vested in the Court. What counts is not the length of the delay but the sufficiency of the cause and shortness of the delay is one of the ...

WebName of the case: State of Nagaland vs. Lipok ao & others Citation: (2005) 3 SCC 752. Relevant para nos.: Para 17 and 18. 17. When the factual background is considered in the light of legal principles as noted above, the inevitable conclusion is that the delay of 57 days deserved condonation.

Web📚 State Of Nagaland V. Lipok AO 2005 📚👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇📖For handwritten Pdf Notes Msg here📖👇:::::WhatsApp :- 8709796188 :::::... richard sullivan asicsWebApr 1, 2005 · State Of Nagaland V. Lipok Ao & Ors in India. State Of Nagaland V. Lipok Ao & Ors [2005] Insc 213 (1 April 2005) Court Judgment Information. Year: 2005. Date: 1 April … redmon roofing jonesboro arWebApr 1, 2005 · Lipok AO (supra). Shri Shishodia also pointed out that the appellants had raised illegal construction and if the challenge to the decrees passed by the trial Court was aborted by the High Court by refusing to condone the delay, serious injury would have been caused to the public interest. 12. richard sullivan obohttp://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/office-of-the-chief-post-master-general-ors-vs-living-media-india-ltd-anr richardsullivan.org his is how power worksWebApr 1, 2005 · State of Nagaland Vs. Lipok AO and Ors. by Court Verdict· April 1, 2005 Email Appeal: Criminal Appeal No. 484 of 2005 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4612 of 2003) … richard sullivan obituaryWebAug 4, 1997 · K V. Ayisumma 1996 10 SCC 634 and State of Nagaland v. Lipok...Ao 2005 3 SCC 752. It was noted that adoption of strict standard of proof sometimes fail to protract public justice, and it would result in public mischief by skilful management of delay in the... redmons gifts phillipsburg moWebApr 14, 2024 · (State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao; 2007 Cr.L.J. 3395 (DB) (Ajai Singh v. State of Maharashtra; AIR 2007 SC 2188) It is also important to note that the accused is provided … richard sullivan psomas